The Bible does not specifically say how tall Adam was in the Garden of Eden, leaving a bit of a mystery for readers to ponder. Adam was the first man created by God, and he was formed out of the dust of the ground. So, while we may not know how tall he was, we can look at the biblical text to gain some insight into the character of this most famous of biblical characters.

When the Bible is discussing Adam’s size, it often uses the descriptive phrase “very good.” This designation is used several times in the book of Genesis. In one particular passage, the Lord God said “It is not good for the man to be alone; I will make him a helper suitable for him” (Genesis 2:18). This suggests that Adam was of a suitable height and size to be his own helper.

The Bible also reveals several other clues about Adam’s general size. During the creation narrative, God surveys each of His creations and pronounces them “very good” (Genesis 1:31). He also takes a rib from Adam and creates the first woman’s body (Genesis 2:21-22). This makes clear that the rib was of a size suitable for fashioning the woman.

Although the Bible doesn’t give an exact dimension for Adam, it paints a strong picture of his size and stature as “very good” in the eyes of God. The fact that Adam was able to be his own helper and provide the necessary material for the creation of woman suggests that he was not misshapen or overly small in size.

There are some ancient interpretations of the Bible that offer greater insight into the size of Adam. According to The Sages’ Bible, Adam was said to have been tall and robust, standing somewhere between 6 and 14 feet tall. However, since this is an ancient interpretation and modern science has not been able to confirm or disprove this, it should be taken with a grain of salt.

Overall, the Bible does not give an exact size for Adam, but provides plenty of clues pointing to him being “very good” in size and stature. The ancient interpretations offer one potential answer to the question of how tall Adam was, but they should be viewed as a commentary rather than as absolute truth.